Closing the gaps in safeguarding

Most of us assume that a DBS check is a reliable safeguard for children and vulnerable adults. Yet in practice, the current system can leave dangerous gaps in protection.

Earlier this year I secured a parliamentary debate on how we safeguard children and vulnerable adults through the Disclosure and Barring Service (DBS) system. Over the years I have undergone dozens of DBS checks, whether for employment in children's services and adult social care or for volunteering with youth clubs or sports and uniformed groups.

The system is clunky and slow, relying on paper-based processes that are almost immediately out of date. Delays can hold up job applications, make it harder for community groups to recruit volunteers at short notice and create a false sense of security when it comes to safeguarding.

During my debate I shared two cases where the system had failed.

The first involved Louise and her husband Richard, who needed care in their home. Louise arranged for a private carer to support them. Because she was not using an agency, she could not access the appropriate DBS information and was unaware that the carer had previous convictions for theft. The carer went on to steal from them and the trauma of the experience ultimately led to Richard moving into residential care.

The second case was raised by Paul, whose granddaughter tragically died from a drugs overdose. She had been introduced to drugs by an individual in a position of influence who did not have a DBS check in place. Because of restrictions in the current system, the family lacked information that may have helped protect their granddaughter.

In the weeks following the debate, changes were made to allow individuals to obtain enhanced DBS checks on people they directly employ and to give parents the right to see a DBS certificate for someone in a position of trust with their child. These are important improvements, but more reform is needed.

I therefore met with the Safeguarding Minister to press for changes, including the creation of a digital DBS continuously updated with relevant information, and the introduction of a carers register to provide greater protection for people inviting carers into their homes.

I was also encouraged to submit proposals for a carer’s register to the Social Care Review being undertaken by Baroness Casey. I am confident these reforms could improve safeguarding while enhancing opportunities and recognition for those working in care.

A fully portable digital DBS would also help employers fill vacancies more quickly and make it easier for community groups, schools and sports clubs to recruit volunteers without unnecessary delays.

The DBS system has frustrated me for years, but my role as an MP has given me the opportunity to take those concerns directly to Ministers and Home Office officials who have the power to make change happen. I am grateful to Paul and Louise for allowing me to share their experiences. Their willingness to speak out is already helping improve safeguarding for others.

If you have experienced difficulties with the DBS system, whether as an employer, volunteer, family carer or care worker, I would welcome hearing your experiences.

Real-life examples often provide the strongest case for reform, helping us make safeguarding stronger for everyone.